European Energy Risk Index (EERI)
Historical snapshot for February 28, 2026
Primary Risk Drivers:
- DNO and Dana Gas halt Kurdistan output after U.S.-Israel strikes on Iran - Reuters
- US attack in Iran poses bigger risk to energy market than Venezuela
- Poland says it had advance knowledge of US-Israel strikes on Iran
(Based on recent EnergyRiskIQ alerts) View alerts →
Top Regions Under Pressure:
- Europe (Primary)
- Black Sea (Secondary)
- Middle East (Tertiary)
Assets Most Affected:
Today’s EERI reading signals a period of pronounced vulnerability for European energy security, underscored by significant upward pressure on both oil and gas supply chains. The index’s “elevated” risk band reflects not only the immediate impact of production halts in the Kurdistan region but also the broader reverberations of escalating military activity in the Middle East. With DNO and Dana Gas suspending operations after U.S.-Israel strikes on Iran, Europe faces the prospect of tighter crude imports at a time when alternative supply routes are already stretched. The confluence of regional stress and heightened contagion risk points to increased volatility in physical flows and pricing, with downstream effects likely to be felt by European industries and end-users in the form of higher costs and supply uncertainty.
Delving into the day’s headline drivers, the abrupt cessation of Kurdish oil output is particularly disruptive given Europe’s reliance on diversified sources to offset Russian supply constraints. The Reuters report on DNO and Dana Gas underscores the fragility of these supply lines, especially as the strikes on Iran elevate the risk of retaliatory action and wider regional escalation. The situation is further complicated by reports that Poland had advance knowledge of the strikes, highlighting the interconnectedness of European security and energy policy. Market participants are rightly concerned about the potential for contagion, as reflected in the index’s elevated transmission and contagion components—should hostilities broaden, critical infrastructure in the Black Sea corridor and beyond could be imperiled. The chorus of expert warnings about the risk of a wider war with Iran, and political backlash in the U.S. over unauthorized military action, injects additional uncertainty into the outlook, raising the specter of both intentional and accidental supply disruptions.
Looking ahead, market professionals should monitor not only the immediate restoration of Kurdish output but also the evolving geopolitical calculus in the Middle East and Europe’s eastern flank. The risk of escalation remains acute; any retaliatory measures by Iran or its proxies could threaten shipping lanes or critical transit infrastructure, amplifying supply shocks. Conversely, diplomatic interventions or a pause in hostilities could ease risk premiums and restore a measure of stability, though the road to normalization is likely to be uneven.